Entries for February, 2008

February 4th, 2008

pila balde

I love doing crazy things with Cathy. One of which was the idea of bathing au naturelle in our laundry area. (Okay, we wore our swim suits. We didn't want to satisfy any possible peeping toms out there and because sometimes, our kid neighbor climbs the tree on the other side of our wall, I dunno why. We don't want any case filed against us.) The faucet got busted and we had to line pails and basins to save the flowing fresh water. With no use for it, we decided (okay, upon my suggestion) to use them for bathing instead...


 
...And had a rather simple UBE moment that Saturday morning. What fun!

At noon, we left for Hyatt Hotel and Casino. Pics in my multiply. That overnight thing was another crazy idea. Being with Cathy for more than 36 hours straight is fun; staying at the Hyatt and dealing with their inefficient discourteous discriminatory staff is not.

Posted by meetjopeblack at 12:01 PM | mix me my whey

February 6th, 2008

crime and misdemeanor: the rape of my herbs



but she's too beautiful to be gunned down.

Posted by meetjopeblack at 10:29 AM | mix me my whey

February 10th, 2008

ako ay may lobo

Fascinated by the poster, I created my own version:


 

It's a far cry from the original but for my purposes, it's a perfect wallpaper for my 5310.

My old one is Michelangelo's David juxtaposed with Alexandros' Venus de Milo:

My new toy and past-time: Photoshop.

Posted by meetjopeblack at 02:04 PM | mix me my whey

February 17th, 2008

what do i write about

There's just so many things going on right now, I don't know where to start. Do I write about my lunch yesterday: tikoy, longganiza, and scrambled egg or my lunch last Monday: daing na bangus and tortellini? I've come up with the worst combinations of food; some bordering on the unpalatable and disgusting. Like pork and beans and Century Tuna Guisado or embotido and pudding. I tell myself as long as I have protein and sufficient carbohydrates, I'm fine by anything on the plate. I'm not complaining. But this is so uncinematic for an entry. I won't write about this one.

How about my laundry-marathon? We have a mountain of soiled clothes piled, untouched for almost two weeks. The success of seeing the laundry bin empty clean is bringing back the lost chi in our room. Now, a fourth are left drying under the overcast sky. If the sky falls, I still have two days to dry them before iron day on Monday.

If I were to write about my laundry, the only thing worth ranting about, which really outrages me (which I'd like to ask Kuya Kim about) is the fact that the weather has been extremely abnormal lately, raining while the sun is at its height is getting more frequent than usual--global warming? again? still? Global warming has been the whipping boy for anything abnormal about the climate or anything we cannot explain about the weather. When's this finger pointing going to end?

Like the issues hounding P and G now. Who's at fault? Is it because P lost time for G that's why G sought solace in another yet to be confirmed femme? Or was it G who felt abandoned by P, hence the cold and silent treatment to punish her gross negligence of her duties? What worries me about their temporary separation is the future of oh so adorable E. Sad, but I don't think I can really write about them here as nothing is final yet and I don't want to incriminate anybody.

Especially now that everyone, thanks to Mr. L, the whole of the Philippines is part of a grand plan of scheming and manipulation to hide graft and corruption under the table and discredit the camisa de chino clad intsik from the province. I believe that he too is a victim--a pawn in the political chess (or better yet, games of the generals), that FG and the chairman have their hands dirtied and souls traded off for millions of dollars in the deal, but I'm afraid that he too, although truthful and credible, is also trying to save himself by exaggerating the story (banking on his tearducts and how lowly he is as evidenced by his shabby clothes and his race) and dragging everyone into the mess so that he'd come out with all the accolade when every one is scourged and down. Corruption happens, yes, and we have got to put an end to this if we want to have a sustainable political and economic growth in our country. However, this cannot be stopped by being noisy and by promoting one's self as the wounded healer. As if it was really his intention to rid the government of gross padding by being an insider at first. How different is Mr. L to the son DV? --who because he did not win the deal, spilled the beans and projected himself as someone who has the best intentions for our country. Who because of death threats and bad PR now wants to redeem one's self by tagging everyone as a bandit and death eaters from the government.

He is touted now as a hero; chillingly being compared even to Ninoy Aquino, the tarmac as their connection. Will this exposé ever bring food to the tables of the Filipinos dying of hunger? Will this give us a good night's sleep someday in the future? Has this advanced our cause and led us to a better life or has this given only the presidential aspirants free media mileage for their personal ambitions? What about the falling stocks and the investor-scare in our country after this fiasco?

While it is true that the truth (and justice and fairness and transparency) should take utmost importance in the running of a country, there are also other values at stake which equally seek address--practical utility and unity off-hand are what comes to my mind. Going to the media, weeping, marching on the streets, bantering, shouting at the pulpit, proselytizing, barging on someone's dinner, ranting, do not do anyone any good. Although we all dream of a better life--an efficient government and honest and fair system for everyone, I don't believe, the above mentioned efforts will make this administration fall. She has mighty bonded herself to her seat, reinforced by strong support from trustworthy allies in the cabinet, military, church, and the media, she will finish her term (and maybe extend some more after).

The only way we can bring this dictatorship down and start a moral revolution is through the arts--where we can be subtle as subtle can be but pinching and creeping our way through the soul of the nation. Gone are days of explicit combat and character assassination. The way to go now is through sublime messages hidden in songs, paintings, movies, and novels. This track may take awhile to take effect but this will be cost effective, long term, and our national image will not be subjected to our worst enemy, which is bad PR.

Like the movie Juno, it is witty, funny, steady, and light. It seems as if through its linearity and happy ending, it isn't saying anything at all. But a lot of issues were raised, like conservative moralism, racism, feminism, individualism versus the family, teenage love and pregnancy, and liberalism. What's the message--no to abortion, no to shotgun weddings, no to teenage motherhood, yes to adoption, yes to single-parenting, yes to love of the dorks. The movie is teeming with all these polarized stands without being too straightforwardly off-putting. We can do the same here in our country. Rock-ed has started the Obamic call for change (long before Obama started his campaign) through music and the arts. Only, make every gig stay within the confines of music and avoid rah-rah-rah's between sets. Let the arts affect the heart--moral change will come after a change in one's soul.

Posted by meetjopeblack at 01:05 PM | 1 bench press(es).

February 19th, 2008

a rather unpopular view at this point

I believe:

1.  Jun Lozada is a credible witness.

2.  the ZTE deal is beset with corruption and that the bureaucratic system is swimming in corruption.

3.  Abalos, being the COMELEC chair, whether he sought for a share in the deal or not, or explicitly asked for a bribe, should not be involved in any business deals the government is entering into, be it to invite investors to our country and more so, if it is for his personal gain.

I'm not sure:

1.  what PGMA's involvement is in this issue:  does she know or does she not know?  If she does know, did she intentionally give it a blind eye?

2.  what we are fighting for.  What is the "PGMA resign" about?  When they say, "Stand on the side of the truth,"  whose truth are they referring to?  It's a naivété to think that truth corresponds to reality and that the human person looking at reality comes not from a certain context without a particular agenda.

3.  what the noise is about.  What are all these things for?

What now?

1.  I believe the senate and other sectors are milking this issue so that PGMA in particular will be implicated and can be impeached and thereby be removed from office.

2.  I believe that because we twice failed in impeaching the president for real impeachable reasons, everyone's an eager beaver in the developments of this case reading the story with the PGMA-is-involved lens presumptuously.

2.  I believe that politicos are pushing their own agenda with the seat of the presidency in 2010 at the back of their minds, using the senate halls and the churches for media mileage.

3.  I believe the senate investigation has served its purpose i.e. to investigate the ZTE deal in aid of legislation and what they are doing now is over and above their mandate as senators.  Next time, the senate should be clear about its objectives every time it opens an investigation so that all the senators will work within the parameters of the investigation in aid of legislation.   Resource persons should not be made to answer for a host of problems which go waywardly in circles repetitiously.

4.  I believe it's right that we demand for a change in the government but this can only happen if we first ask ourselves and our moral guardians, i.e. the Church, what it has done to teach its flock about honesty, accountability, and fairness and what we have done to practice our worship.  

5.  I believe the time is not yet ripe to call on the ouster of PGMA.  Even Jun Lozada is not sure if PGMA has something to do with the Abalos affair.

May this be a lesson to the voting public:  once we get someone in office, we have given him/her up to the dynamics of power.  In our country, to get someone out of office is impossible to do.

Managing a government and running a nation is no walk in the park.  Every mistake is costly, irrevocable, and eternally imprinted on the psyche and history of the nation.  When will we learn?

Posted by meetjopeblack at 10:27 AM | mix me my whey

February 22nd, 2008

a lenten prayer: how to fast

Fast from judging others; feast on the Christ dwelling within them.
Fast from emphasis on differences; feast on the unity of all life.
Fast from apparent darkness; feast on the reality of light.
Fast from words that pollute; feast on phrases that purify.
Fast from discontent; feast on gratitude.
Fast from anger; feast on patience.
Fast from pessimism; feast on optimism.
Fast from worry; feast on trust.
Fast from complaining; feast on appreciation.
Fast from negatives; feast on affirmatives.
Fast from unrelenting pressures; feast on unceasing prayer.
Fast from hostility; feast on nonviolence.
Fast from bitterness; feast on forgiveness.
Fast from self-concern; feast on compassion for others.
Fast from personal anxiety; feast on eternal truth.
Fast from discouragement; feast on hope.
Fast from facts that depress; feast on truths that uplift.
Fast from lethargy; feast on enthusiasm.
Fast from suspicion; feast on truth.
Fast from thoughts that weaken; feast on promises that inspire.
Fast from idle gossip; feast on purposeful silence.

Gentle God, during this season of fasting and feasting, gift us with Your
Presence, so we can be gift to others in carrying out your work. Amen.

Posted by meetjopeblack at 11:17 AM | 1 bench press(es).

February 25th, 2008

hindi ka nag-iisa.

Isn't it clear even from the start that Jun Lozada is talking about the system and not about the president in particular? If the administration has nothing to do with the kickbacks, why is it trying the damnest to hide the truth? Why is the administration trying hard to shut Lozada up?

Answer: Because it will open a can of worms which ran governments since time immemorial. It might make the people lose confidence in the system. Because it is also trying to protect people who are clean. Because we probably can't handle the truth. Just look at how confused and directionless everyone is now!

When the gravity of corruption is exposed, this administration fears that this might legitimize corruption being already out in the open. Of course, no sound mind will accept corruption as morally right (and my conclusion as non sequitour and appalling). In theory, no person will approve of corruption. But in practice, REALLY, this exposé may be used as an excuse by anyone who wants to get his way: "This politician got away with it, why can't I?" Ours may not be as gross as the $130 million dollar deal, but one way or another, have we not given favors to officials or colleagues to have things done our way. Have we not pulled strings to avoid the hassle of lining up to Wowowee or to get a VISA at the US Embassy or to be allowed in the VIP section of Embassy?

I'm not saying that we should let the implicated officials in the ZTE deal go because we too are not clean. On the contrary, we should run after them, make them explain, and use the full force of the law on them. But this ruckus is more than the ZTE deal. The issue here is no longer about the truth--whether bribes and kickbacks were taken or not. What we should address heretoforth is how corruption should be stopped by enacting and implementing laws, strengthening the justice system, and intensifying moral education. The J. Lo. exposé is about how deals are made in this country (and God, I've heard this ever since I was a kid!). Finally, an insider denounced the unfairness of such trades.

Here, everybody has been tagged by J. Lo. This is like the Facebook of our country--one is linked with everybody else by virtue of being part of one's contacts. What Lozada's exposé did was tag all of us. We belong to this corrupt system and we all have our share in cuddling this disease directly or indirectly. Our enemy is corruption and how we all have turned a blind eye on it through history! Are we in the hunt for corrupt persons leaving no stones unturned and in our hunt found only one--PGMA? So by getting rid of PGMA we mean, we can have a renewed national spirit and a clean system? We have eradicated corruption?

 C'mon! By now we should know that that corrupt person is in the bank, in our school, in the church, in businesses, beside you, around you, in you, in all of us! If we are sincere about this fight against moral decay, no one should be spared from the rod. My visual imagery here is the scene from the movie, La Reine Margot, when the grounds of Paris became a canvas of blood and gore as the Protestant guests of Marguerite de Valois were massacred upon the orders of Catherine de Medici. That I think is what we should do--gear up for battle, massacre the corrupt, shout ahoo! ahoo! ahoo!!

This issue here is not about the president or her administration. This is about us and how we want to clean up the system. This is about corruption eating the moral fiber of our nation. Don't be misled by opportunists both fame-seeking power-hungry individuals or know-it-all anarchists carrying the banner of liberation, truth, and justice for all.

And oh, healing the system cannot be done by prayer rallies and noise barrages alone. I think we know how we ought to be more proactive than that. Geez!

Posted by meetjopeblack at 07:45 PM | mix me my whey